The Impact of Smart Interactive Products on Sustainable Environmental Adoption
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35560/jcofarts1631Keywords:
Smart products, sustainability, interactive design, environmental behavior, smart personalization, cognitive dissonance, circular economyAbstract
In the face of escalating environmental challenges, such as climate change and the depletion of natural resources, smart technological solutions have emerged as an effective tool for promoting sustainability. The research question is: How can these products transform from entertainment or technological tools into drivers of environmental change? This research aims to explore the impact of smart interactive products on the adoption of environmental behaviors, focusing on their interaction mechanisms with users and their optimal design. The results showed that smart personalization and symbolic feedback promote sustainable behaviors, but challenges such as "cognitive dissonance" and "tech fatigue" reduce their effectiveness. The study also emphasized the importance of integrating cultural and social dimensions into design to increase the acceptance of sustainable solutions, especially in non-urban communities. One of the most prominent conclusions is that true sustainability requires a comprehensive analysis of the product life cycle, not just focusing on the use phase. The local cultural and environmental context is also a crucial factor in the success of smart solutions, especially in communities with strong privacy. The research recommends adopting simple, culturally sensitive designs and enhancing collaboration between designers and environmental experts to achieve comprehensive sustainability
References
A.S.Hornby, Oxford Advanced Learners Dictionary, Oxford University Press, 2004
Abrahamse,W & Steg, L. (2013). Social influence approaches to encourage resource conservation: A meta-analysis. Global Environmental Change, 33 , 184-196.
Agata Kubiak - 12 Restaurant Technology Trends (2024 Updated). https://www.upmenu.com/blog/restaurant-technology/ . 8 January 2025
Aivazidou, E.; Banias, G.;Lampridi, M.; Vasileiadis, G.;Anagnostis, A.; Papageorgiou, E.;Bochtis, D. Smart Technologies for SustainableWater Management: AnUrban Analysis. Sustainability 2021, MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413940
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. University of Massachusetts at Amherst, Academic Press. Inc 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Al-Ramini, Manar. Sustainable Design Standards and Their Impact on the Interior Design Environment, Department of Interior Design and Furniture, Faculty of Applied Arts, Helwan University, 2015, unpublished master's thesis.
Anshu Kale .United Nations (UN). (2023). Sustainable Development Goals Report . https://sdgs.un.org
Arya Majidi. City with Smart Waste Management: Introducing Waste Bin Technologies.2021. Universidad Nacional de Ingeniería .IRAN.P1034
Becky L. Drees، et al . "Derivation of genetic interaction networks from quantitative phenotype data". Genome Biology 6 (4). 2005.p 432.
Bernald Myers, Les arts visuels et comment nous les goûtons, trad. American Textbooks and Reference Group, Le Caire, 1966.
Ceschin, F., & Gaziulusoy, I. (2020). Design for Sustainability: A Multi-level Framework from Products to Sociotechnical Systems. (1 ed.) UK .(Routledge focus on environment and sustainability). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429456510
Eli Blevis. Sustainable interaction design: invention & disposal, renewal & reuse.2007. Indiana University at Bloomington, Indiana USA.P7
Evgeniya NigayYuliya LebedinskayaElena Koshevaya. Digital transformation of the customer interaction system in the business model of the organization based on the omnichannel approach.2021. SHS Web of Conferences
Fogg, B. J. (2019). Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do . Morgan Kaufmann Publishers. P114
Hristova, V., Haralampiev,K., Vlaev, I., & Karabeliova, S. (2025).Predicting Pro-Environmental Behavior: The Leading Influence of Environmental Attitudes. Behavioral Sciences, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria 15(3), 291. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15030291
Koushik Mandlem, Bhaskaran Gopalakrishnan*, Ashish Nimbarte, Roseline Mostafa and Rupa Das. Energy Efficiency Effectiveness of Smart Thermostat Based BEMS.2020. Industrial and Management Systems Engineering, West Virginia University, Morgantown,USA. https://doi.org/10.32604/EE.2020.011406 P.170
Lee Rainie, Janna Anderson . Emily A. Vogels . “Experts Doubt Ethical AI Design Will Be Broadly Adopted as the Norm in the Next Decade” . 2021.Pew Research Center
Martin Korte.The impact of the digital revolution on human brain and behavior: where do we stand?.Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2020;22(2):101-111. doi:10.31887/DCNS.2020.22.2/mkorte
Michael J. Carter . Celene Fuller . Symbolic Interactionism . California State University, Northridge, 2016.p2 USA DOI: 10.1177/205684601561
Mirja Kalviainen. Design Tools for Sustainable Behaviour Change. ahti Design Annual Review 2019. Lahti: Lahti University of Applied.P21
Mukhiffun Mukapit.Siti ROHANA Daud.Mohd Nasir Selamat. .2024.Bridging Innovation and Sustainability: A Systematic Review of Innovative Work Behavior and Green Practices. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia. ISSN 2220-3796 .
OECD (2023), OECD Economic Surveys: Sweden 2023, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/ceed5fd4-en.
Philips Lighting. 5 New Year’s resolutions made better with proper lighting.2016
Rittl, L.G.F.; Zaman, A.; de Oliveira, F.H. Digital Transformation in Waste Management: Disruptive Innovation and Digital Governance for Zero-Waste Cities in the Global South as Keys to Future Sustainable Development. Sustainability 2025,
Taylor Willmott .Change by Design: The 5-step Human-Centered Design Process .griffith-business-school
Tim Jackson. Motivating Sustainable Consumption. a report to the Sustainable Development Research Network.2005. Environmental Strategy University of Surrey.P30
Uusitalo, S., & Paasi, J. (2024). Health-Safe Smart Building: Final results of E3 project task ’Smart building’.
Weijia He, Jesse Martinez, Roshni Padhi, Lefan Zhang, When Smart Devices Are Stupid: Negative Experiences Using Home Smart Devices.2019. Blase Ur University of Chicago.P153
Weiser, M. (1991). The computer for the 21st century . Scientific American, 265(3), 94-104.
World Health Organization (WHO). (2020). Sedentary behaviour and health outcomes . https://www.who.int/publications ISBN:9789240015128
Yong Zeng. Environment-Based Design (EBD): a Methodology for Transdisciplinary Design.2015. Journal of Integrated Design and Process Science. DOI:10.3233/jid-2015-0004. P
Zan Gao. Jung Eun Lee . Emerging Technology in Promoting Physical Activity and Health: Challenges and Opportunities. 2019. journal of Editorial Clinical Medicine.p5
Muhammad Abd al-Hamid, Media Theories and Trends of Influence, Alam al-Kutub Press, Cairo, 1997, p. 21
